Many project developers who initially explored Fischer-Tropsch technologies for eSAF production are now also analysing the opportunities of Methanol-to-Jet (MtJ). Why? Increasingly, developers are trying to de-risk their projects in any possible way to get closer to FID. One way is launching a methanol project first and selling to centralized MtJ operators instead of producing the eSAF themselves.
Our experts discussed the key differences between Fischer-Tropsch and Methanol-to-Jet technologies, opportunities for flexible global supply chain setups, including the option to separate methanol and MtJ production across different locations, as well as the challenges and market uptake of both technologies.
louis.lammertyn@hinicio.com
martin.chapuis@hinicio.com
Methanol-to-Jet versus Fischer-Tropsch differences: flexibility, selectivity, efficiency, technological maturity, overview of projects globally.
Possibilities in terms of global supply chain setups and flexibility, including splitting MeOH & MtJ production in different locations and the impact on the levelized-cost-of-jetfuel.
Expert views of two of the world’s most leading OEM’s on the opportunities, challenges and uptake of both Methanol-to-Jet and Fischer-Tropsch equipment.
00:00 – 00:10 | Opening presentation: MtJ vs FT Pathways
Presented by Hinicio
00:10 – 00:30 | Deep dive: Global supply chain configurations
00:30- 01:00 | Expert Panel: Perspectives from MtJ & FT Technology Providers
Click to download the webinar presentation
Click to download the webinar presentation
